Monday, 10 February 2014
New & Digital Media: Week 10 / Week 5 IN&DM
Thursday, 6 February 2014
Citizen Journalism - Media Magazine December 2009 Is Reality becoming more real ?
- Once, it was all quite simple…the big institutions created the news and broadcast it to a variously passive and receptive audience. Now new technologies mean that the audience are no longer passive receivers of news. The audience have become ‘users’ and the users have become publishers. Audiences now create their own content. We are in the era of user generated content (UGC) where the old divide between institution and audience is being eroded.
- Key to this change has been the development of new technologies such as video phones and the growth of the internet and user-dominated sites
- As technology improved over the years, incidents of this kind have become more and more common. Millions of people have constant access to filming capability through their mobiles, and footage can be uploaded and rapidly distributed on the internet.
- Gulf War, 9/11, Rodney King, Tsunami, 2005 London Bombings, Mumbai Bombings.
- The theory involved in reality becoming more real is Baudrillaud's proposed theory of hyperreality. The theory is a term used in semiotics and post-modernism philosophy to describe an inability of consciousness to distinguish reality from a stimulation of reality, especially in technologically ordained post-modern society.
- Institutions are able to get access to news via journalists easier, it detracts the risk involved in filming from journalists, it also saves institutions money due to the fact that they do not have to pay to send out news reporters in different countries as soon as something happens as now a days, a lot of video footage is sent in to the these news institutions. Events such as the Tsunami and bombings could be seen as a risk to news reporters, even though it is there job, there is still a high risk involved, but with footage of the Tsunami being sent in, it saved many journalists from filming on the scene as it happened. With less journalists they also save money, vital benefit to the institution.
- Audience members are now able to get 'real' news, the examples of major events such as the London, Mumbai bombings and also 9/11, how these were shown on the news was seen as an actual benefit to the audience, due to the fact that they got real news, by real news meaning that they got footage that was live from the scene and people saw what happened at the exact moment rather than seeing the aftermath of the event, so the benefits to the audience is that they get real news rather than the aftermath's first.
- Quality of footage will decrease, furthermore, due to the fact that the footage may not go through the gatekeeper, the footage could be imbalanced. This could potentially be bad for the media institutions due to the fact that the footage could be shown straight away rather than being checked due to the demand of the audience and the competition with other institutions.
- Social - Things such as the riots caused social unrest in society, the fact that the news reported that the riots are spreading resulted in the riots spreading. Thus causing social unrest in society.
- Historical - Rodney King, the attack on Rodney King was filmed causing the police officers to go into court, even though they were acquitted, it showed how new and digital media can have an impact of Law
- Economical - Benefits to institution, due to the fact that they are being sent in footage, they are able to get rid of normal journalists as they do not need most of them, they are sent in footage by citizen journalists instead.
2) What was one of the first examples of news being generated by ‘ordinary people’?
3) List some of the formats for participation that are now offered by news organisations.
5) What is a gatekeeper?
6) How has the role of a gatekeeper changed?
7) What is one of the primary concerns held by journalists over the rise of UGC?
Wednesday, 5 February 2014
New & Digital Media: Week 9 / Week 4 IN&DM
Bill Gates has quit as Microsoft chairman to take up a new role as technology adviser in a management shake-up that will see Satya Nadella become chief executive. This is also only the third time Mircosoft has had a new chief executive. Gates' new role however will see him spending more time at Mircosoft and many say if he does his job well, this could be a good thing for Microsoft, Gates' was also advised by Nadella to step down which he happily did. Gates' has also focused more on the Gates' foundation since leaving Microsoft in 2008 thus this will see Gates back at Microsoft.
In my opinion I believe this may be a good thing for Microsoft, Gates' has focused more on his charity in the last few years thus coming back to Microsoft in a new role could see Gates change the game especially in his new role as a technology adviser